다음 글의 내용과 일치하지 않는 것은? When the children had originally been shown what we think of as an object, like the copper tee, they pointed to an object of the same shape but a different substance, such as a plastic plumbing tee, not to the same substance with a different shape, namely a pile of copper bits. But when they had originally been shown what we think of as a substance, like the hair gel, they pointed to the same substance regardless of its shape, such as three smears of hair gel, and not to the same shape of a different substance, such an identically curved glob of hand cream. So well before children know how the English language distinguishes individual objects from portions of a substance, they distinguish them on their own, and generalize words for them accordingly. Names for solids with a noteworthy shape are taken to apply to objects of that kind; names for nonsolids with an arbitrary shape are taken to apply to substances of that kind.
정답 4번Children can distinguish objects from substances only after they know how their language distinguishes them.
인사혁신처 공식 최종정답은 4번입니다. 공식 해설은 별도로 제공되지 않았습니다.
오답 포인트
‘다음 글의 내용과 일치하지 않는 것은? When the children had originally bee…’의 판단 기준은 ‘Children can distinguish objects from substances only after they know how their language distinguishes them.’입니다. 정답 문구와 해설의 조건을 함께 연결해 기억하세요.
공식 문제지와 최종정답을 문항별로 대조한 기출문제입니다. 공식 해설이 제공되지 않은 문항은 정답 근거만 표시합니다.