※ 글의 내용과 일치하지 않는 것은? [문 4～문 5] The United States will likely face strategic restraints in the second decade of this century. While short-term defence budget expansion may be possible to meet a crisis, a sustained increase appears out of the question. The military future for the United States, therefore, is one of making do with less. It will not keep pace with the defence expansion of potential competitors. Russia and China almost doubled their military spending over the first decade of the twenty-first century and look set to continue this rate of growth in the second on the back of their buoyant economies. This does not represent a threat to the military supremacy of the US, but its competitors will use their fiscal advantage to disrupt its superiority. Moreover, the pressure for deficit reduction is likely to impact negatively upon defence investment that meets future rather than immediate needs. Therefore, the United States may have to develop a strategy that prioritizes ends and links them to means, somewhat in the manner of Dwight Eisenhower in the 1950s rather than one based on assumptions that its economic power can underwrite military expansion as in the 1980s.